Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evolution of Music Management


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Userfy per request; otherwise, DELETE. - Philippe 02:46, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Evolution of Music Management

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested Prod. Essay about music management. Sourced, but largely an opinion piece. Delete. Blanchardb- Me • MyEars • MyMouth -timed 00:12, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as essay. JJL (talk) 01:22, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Should've been speedied.  Not even remotely encyclopedic. Qworty (talk) 04:07, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Essay.  Reads like a class report for school.  Is this another dump from a college econ 101 class? KleenupKrew (talk) 11:15, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Someone (presumably XQueenzx) obviously put effort into it but this is clearly an essay, not an encyclopedia article (it even ends with a "Conclusion" section). I suggest the author not feel discouraged and that they find an appropriate way to contribute their knowledge to Wikipedia. I'll bet they can help improve articles like [[Music industry]]. -- MQ Duck 12:09, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Almost pure WP:OR. Nsk92 (talk) 18:55, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Userfy to me This has potential. Shame it wasn't even tagged for being an essay but went straight to AfD. I will take it upon myself to construct a neutral encyclopedia article out of this. Talk to me. --Pwnage8 (talk) 16:19, 13 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.