Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evolution of knowledge


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Shanel 18:55, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

Evolution of knowledge
Originally tagged as copyvio, but frankly looks much more to me like original research. States and attempts to prove an original thesis, rather than summarizing an existing field of study. Delete as inappropriate for an encyclopedia. Bearcat 23:09, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, Yap, looks like an essay to me O bli (Talk) 23:16, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: WP:NOT a publisher of original thought -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 00:33, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. per nom--Esprit15d 13:27, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Latinus 22:33, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOR, as it concludes without reference, [The] “elitist” attitude [of Wikipedia] is being re-examined.... there will continue to be a concomitant evolution of our concepts of knowledge. The Rod 00:31, 1 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.