Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evolution of the Judiciary in the Maldives


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. The plagiarism issue has been addressed. Can be speedy renominated with a different deletion rationale. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:09, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Evolution of the Judiciary in the Maldives

 * – ( View AfD View log )

evidence of plagarism, please see article's talk page for full details. Nihola (talk) 16:17, 28 February 2011 (UTC) ---Ouch...sorry. You were right, I've never heard of that 'publisher'. It wasn't obvious to me, just like the hundreds of other things with wikipedia that are simple once experienced, but not obvious to the uninitiated. And probably too late in the evening/too many articles to boot. I think the article is interesting/important, and worked on it when I came to it from 'wikify'. However, not being able to find any online info about this subject except that one is a problem, and is still going to be a problem, no? How to deal with this? Nihola (talk) 16:08, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Maldives-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:12, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:12, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:12, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep as having an invalid deletion rationale. The book linked on the talk page is published by Books, LLC, which takes its content from Wikipedia, so is a copy of this article rather than this article being a copy of the book. Even if the nominator was unfamiliar with this publisher I would have thought that the facts that our article was created in 2006 and the book published in 2010 would have made the situation pretty clear. Phil Bridger (talk) 23:32, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
 * It might be best to withdraw the nomination and consider what can be done with this content. A rename could help, simply to Judiciary in the Maldives, and that's sure to have sources on it. We have an unsourced section at Maldives which could do with improvement. If you do withdraw, let me or WT:AFD know and we can speedy keep. Fences  &amp;  Windows  06:36, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, withdrawn nom please. thnks. Nihola (talk) 17:46, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.