Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evolution of the Wizarding World

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. The article contains a block-compress spell, and will be deleted when a counter-spell is created. Joyous 19:12, Mar 19, 2005 (UTC)

Evolution of the Wizarding World
Incoherent rambling that admits it has no relation to HP. Crash and burn. Extremely delete. J OHN C OLLISON (An Liúdramán) 22:24, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as fancruft, patent nonsence and/or original research. Thryduulf 23:18, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, first sentence is Note: this article is pure speculation and has little or no actual scientific grounding. Babbling, nonsensical original research, yes, extremely. Wyss 01:42, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete due to ridiculous, "magical research" that somehow manages to make itself think it's a wild Harry Potter theory. I'm amazed that this page was listed as a "rapid delete" for patent nonsense. CryptoStorm 03:59, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * I presume you mean wasn't listed. Thryduulf 04:11, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, for it is complete and utter nonsense, and isn't even relevant to the Harry Potter books Bonus Onus 19:40, Mar 12, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as nonsense, not even BJAODN quality - David Gerard 15:38, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd 14:55, Mar 14, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.