Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evolutionary medicine

 :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.''

The result was Bizarre adventure. The AfD is being closed many years later, because it was never properly closed back then, because it was never visible, because it was never transcluded on any of the daily logpages. Technically, it has still been open this whole time.

Nobody else could ever be admitted here, because this door was made only for you. I am now going to shut it. jp×g 00:48, 18 October 2022 (UTC) (non-admin closure)

Evolutionary medicine

 * – (View AfD


 * Delete - this is not a recognised field of study on its own Evoluu 00:13, 31 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Something odd is going on here. Evoluu has been a contributor to this article, and now he is challenging it?  I worked on removing some POV issues yesterday and today removing some puffery, but still felt that it should be tagged for NPOV.
 * The established editor User:Evolu has edited the article in the past. User:Evoluu (notice the extra "u") is the one proposing deletion.  SWAdair | Talk 02:14, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
 * At least someone has a sense of humor. One SPA spoofing another SPA.  Still, not cool.  SWAdair | Talk 02:43, 31 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep Keep or Merge It seems that there is a body of work referenced from here which may make it notable, but could this be merged elsewhere . Changed due to information from SWAdair --Kevin Murray 01:41, 31 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep. Bad faith nomination.  42,000 Ghits for "evolutionary medicine", a bibliography section that in itself indicates this is a legitimate branch of medicine, and a SPA imposter attempting to spoof an established editor.  SWAdair | Talk 02:14, 31 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.