Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evolutionary processes

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Delete 6 / Redirect 3: delete. -- AllyUnion (talk) 05:55, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Evolutionary processes
The name is deceptive, appears to be a summary of some original research to do with computing--nixie 02:15, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. It feels like advertising for gilb.com's particular flavor of the iterative development software design methodology. --Carnildo 02:50, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Delete --fvw *  06:23, 2005 Jan 31 (UTC)
 * Delete this. Probably should replace with redirect to evolution or evolution (disambiguation).--ZayZayEM 13:58, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Given that his email address is from Gilb, this is obviously vanity, advertising, and original research. 4 hit for "Evolutionary System Development Processes" means it's entirely non-notable as well. &mdash; Asbestos | Talk 21:48, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Evolution. Megan1967 02:50, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Hard to decide between spam, advertising or original research. Regardless, delete.  After the history is clean, a redirect might be appropriate to keep it from coming back.  Rossami (talk) 04:18, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Evolution - David Gerard 16:17, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect. -Sean Curtin 06:49, Feb 4, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. dbenbenn | talk 04:19, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)