Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evolve Artist


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 18:10, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Evolve Artist

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional. References are not independent of the online art school. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 17:04, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π,  ν ) 17:04, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

References not independent of the online art school are not longer present. Ptt1234 12:47, 12 July 2019 (PT)
 * Delete the company has not received significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. Interested editors may want to check the related page, Old Holland for promotion as well. Evolve isn't notable, but Old Holland likely is. They make nice paint, but the article reads like it's been written by their marketing department. Vexations (talk) 20:44, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Despite recent edits, Vex's points remain valid. This company has no significant coverage of independent, reliable sources.--MarshalN20 ✉ 🕊 19:02, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - Sources do not meet WP:ORGCRIT (both those provided and the search online I conducted). --CNMall41 (talk) 04:05, 16 July 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.