Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ewa Wojkowska


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Kopernik (organization). Insufficient independent coverage to justify a stand-alone article per keep !votes. Only significant coverage is in the context of Kopernik hence redirect as an alternative to deletion. Philg88 ♦talk 07:09, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Ewa Wojkowska

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I stand by my original prod rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (biographies) requirement." This was deprodded by creator, but I don't believe new sources are sufficient to change my initial assessment. PS. See related AfD: Articles for deletion/Kopernik (organization) Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 04:33, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep Wojkowska has significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources per WP:BASIC. See, e.g.,, and . 24.151.10.165 (talk) 06:09, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Hardly. - she is mentioned once by name in the article, and shown one in a captioned photo. The article could be used as a source showing news coverage about the foundation she runs, but she is only mentioned in passing. The  in Jakarta Globe is more of the same: she is mentioned more, but this is an article about her foundation based on interview(s) with her; she is quoted several times and named, but this is not a source about her.  is a short press-release like note about her and several other volunteers visiting United Nations Volunteers. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  09:04, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep She is easily notable as per the sources listed in the article. And an inspiration - why are we seeking to downplay TED speakers? --Pete (talk) 16:10, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I put some effort into explaining above why the sources are not sufficient. By saying the sources are good enough you are simply saying WP:JUSTAPOLICY - hardly a valid argument. Regarding TED speakers, she was a regional one, not a main TED speaker. Regional TED speakers are numerous, and often poorly vetted, thus I don't think it's a criteria of notability. Feel free to point me to a policy that classifies regional TED speakers as automatically notable. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 03:38, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:51, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:51, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. AlanS (talk) 10:44, 21 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Only two of the references in the whole article are completely independent from the subject and reliable. Those being the Jakarta Post link and the Jarkata Globe link. The rest are either from her companies website or YouTube or the United Nations Development Program, who the subject has worked with. The two links that do constitute completely independent sources do not constitute in depth coverage of her. Fails WP:BIO. AlanS (talk) 10:52, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  15:00, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 21:24, 6 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete, though evidently a successful entrepreneur this article is basically a CV with little evidence at all of reliable secondary coverage about her. Sionk (talk) 23:02, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Kopernik (organization). The coverage that exists only seems to mention her in the context of this organization. A separate article isn't justified. --Michig (talk) 08:18, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - While a case can be made for a redirect to her clearly notable company, I think the fact that this is a TED speaker gives the nudge to this subject over the GNG bar. Yeah, it's a borderline call — but the bio includes useful information that would be lost in a merge, methinks. Carrite (talk) 10:52, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
 * WP:ITSUSEFUL is explicitly listed as not a valid argument, I am afraid. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 01:54, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.