Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ewan Urain


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗ plicit  06:56, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Ewan Urain

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Subject fails both WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY, never played in a WP:FPL. BRDude70 ( talk ) 01:27, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 01:49, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 01:49, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 01:50, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 01:50, 9 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment. The references look good. Perhaps he passes WP:GNG. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 01:51, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment. Definitely fails FOOTY at this point (despite the disingenuous comment by the creator "created page as the player has joined the first team" - he is still solidly with the reserve squad, hasn't even been on the bench for the senior team). As above, may pass GNG due to a few articles in national media on him playing for Scotland (or being selected for the squad I should say, since they didn't bother putting him on the field on Tuesday). Crowsus (talk) 06:45, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:43, 9 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep - probably scrapes through GNG with the Scotsman article. GiantSnowman 17:59, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep scrapes through WP:GNG further subject is 21 years and has a ongoing career hence see little point in deleting it.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:07, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - coverage from cited sources as well as One Football, AS, El Correo and La Sexta is likely enough for GNG Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:45, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks, added a couple of those. Crowsus (talk) 21:45, 10 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep - I see the issues here, but on balance I think he meets notability on level of coverage he has received. Also as a player involved with Under-21 squad, he is likely someone that people would search Wikipedia to find out more about. Dunarc (talk) 22:48, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak keep as coverage is borderline GNG and subject has potential. No Great Shaker (talk) 04:18, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep, has received significant coverage from national media.Jackattack1597 (talk)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.