Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ewing Irrigation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was DELETE. -Docg 01:40, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Ewing Irrigation

 * — (View AfD)


 * Delete: Vanity article about non-notable company that doesn't meet WP:CORP. Many Google hits but most appear to be self-promo and directory listings. —Wknight94 (talk) 20:03, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable family business. Caknuck 20:28, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
 * They did partner to publish a book, but the book should have an article (if at all), not the company that partnered to publish it. Because of that, I vote delete. --Адам12901 Talk 21:31, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. References from several sources may be sufficient to meet WP:CORP --Eastmain 22:18, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete for lack of notability. Having some references is important but is not sufficient. Doczilla 07:21, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete without prejudice to re-creation if notability can be more clearly demonstrated. Existence on its own is not notable. WMMartin 20:52, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.