Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ewwy Award


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Entertainment Weekly. v/r - TP 22:20, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Ewwy Award

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Delete - no independent reliable sources attest to the notability of this entertainment "award" given out by an entertainment magazine. Sources trace back to the magazine itself. PROD removed by IP "editor" without comment, which in my opinion should be treated as if it didn't happen. Harley Hudson (talk) 05:48, 1 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Smerge to Entertainment Weekly. The only coverage of the Ewwy awards is from Entertainment Weekly itself.  It would be appropriate to trim heavily and merge the main details. -- Whpq (talk) 15:53, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep A basic Google search came up with these third party sources:     R uby2010   comment!  04:25, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment - The first item is a blog from AMC touting their own show, and encouraging viewers to vote for them; the second is a press release. Neither of those are reliable sources.  I'm not sure what sort of editorial oversight is used on that site.  At this point, I wouldn't put much weight into it for establishing notability. -- Whpq (talk) 11:55, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan Talk Contributions 00:13, 16 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Non-notable blog award rewarding shows not good enough for the Emmys, of which there are at least 50-100 of which on various TV blogs in mid-July every year.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 05:52, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Smerge to Entertainment Weekly per Whpq. No need for a separate article, but there are four sources that should be kept. Bearian (talk) 19:35, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Smerge. It would belong better in the main subject's article. Not to mention Entertainment Weekly being a reliable source, I don't see why it can't go in the Entertainment Weekly article. SwisterTwister   talk  05:40, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.