Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ex (relationship)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was wiktionary redirect.  Sandstein  17:36, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

Ex (relationship)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Seeing how the only citation here is Reference.com, this seems to be precisely a dictionary definition of a neologism. Could be a one-line mention in interpersonal relationship. Zim Zala Bim talk 22:22, 23 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Convert into Wiktionary redirect Through pageviews, we can see that readers on Wikipedia indeed search for this word; over 100 pageviews are present on average daily. wiktionary redirect suggests converting articles into redirects to Wiktionary in the following circumstances:
 * There is no scope for a Wikipedia article at this title, and
 * A Google search yields a variety of self-help-like and blog results, including some from sites like Bustle with questionable notability and worthiness of encyclopedic coverage. I do not believe that an article is warranted at this time.
 * There is no other Wikipedia page to which this would be an appropriate redirect, and
 * There is a relevant entry in Wiktionary, and
 * The relevant entry is of a proper length, well-formatted and meets the standards for Wiktionary entries.
 * Readers search for it on Wikipedia.
 * See pageview evidence above.
 * As such, I believe the contents of this page should be replaced with " ", as it will provide useful information to serve readers. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him &#124; talk) 22:42, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
 * As such, I believe the contents of this page should be replaced with " ", as it will provide useful information to serve readers. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him &#124; talk) 22:42, 23 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Convert to Wiktionary redirect per above. XtraJovial (talk • contribs) 23:25, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Seems right, please wikt. – SJ + 13:52, 24 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.