Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ex Parte Boedel Steenkamp


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Law of persons in South Africa. ✗ plicit  01:39, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Ex Parte Boedel Steenkamp

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Legal case which fails WP:GNG. Relies on a single primary source and reads like it was copied and pasted from a law handbook or similar. The topic is not by itself notable, but anything useful here could probably be merged with Fetal rights. Mako001 (talk) 16:12, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Mako001 (talk) 16:12, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Mako001 (talk) 16:12, 27 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment: The appropriate merge/redirect target would be Law of persons in South Africa. - htonl (talk) 17:32, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 10:54, 5 December 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bungle (talk • contribs) 22:46, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak delete/redirect the case is discussed in this paper but I can't find evidence that GNG is met. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  05:08, 29 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.