Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exa Web Solutions


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Spinning Spark  17:02, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Exa Web Solutions

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

no indication of notability. Of the given refs, 1 is not significant - a copy of correspondence with the government, 2-4 are all based on the same press release, 5-8 do not mention the company, 9-12 are directory entries. Google searches not finding anything significant. Disputed prod. Article creator seems to think that being assisted by a state government makes it notable. noq (talk) 08:17, 24 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete I'm also unable to find any reliable secondary sources. Nothing coming up in Aussie news sites, either. Does not meet WP:ORG at this time. --Breno talk 10:52, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 25 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete fails WP:GNG. nothing in gnews. no real coverage LibStar (talk) 01:34, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. No significant coverage by reliable secondary sources outside of press releases. The subject fails to meet the general notability guideline and the notability guideline for organisations.-- xanchester  (t)  08:54, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep with Rewrite. I agree with the humanitarian cause of putting this article over Wiki. The article can stay but with rewrites on specific parts like "Research and innovation" which looks like a product or org Promo. Ankaraman (talk) 04:58, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment What humanitarian cause? What is there to establish notability. noq (talk) 14:31, 31 October 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.