Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exact Air


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 13:44, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Exact Air

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable flight school. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 17:53, 19 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - while it is more than just a flight school, it nevertheless fails to meet the guidelines for company notability; and by extension the general notability guidelines YSSYguy (talk) 19:09, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:21, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:21, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:21, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:21, 20 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - Fails WP:GNG no cited sources outside the company website and the govt listing of aircraft. No significant coverage in third party sources. - Ahunt (talk) 13:46, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete -no third-party coverage about the company so it seems to just be purely promotional for its flight school Burroughs&#39;10 (talk) 17:46, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:00, 24 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as nothing currently suggesting the necessary notability improvements. SwisterTwister   talk  21:56, 25 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.