Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exact Prime Counting Method


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per WP:CSD. Amalthea 15:41, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Exact Prime Counting Method

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Pure original research overlaid onto a copy-and-paste of Sieve of Eratosthenes. -- The Anome (talk) 14:23, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. Appears to be a POV fork? -- Escape Orbit  (Talk) 14:33, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Resueman Wikipedia, much like Scientology and like some cults have done has crafted a specific set unique terms not used elsewhere (because they are intentionally vague and skirt the issue or motivation or do not give a detailed acccount at face value of the issue at hand) to serve themselves. It is like how after World War II in Germany mixed race children were called by the code name of Rheinlandbastards. "This appears to be a Rheinlandbastards." As though just by giving it a name they are justified to do what they do. It is a mathematics article with correct new information. It was ill-tolerated because the community tolerated individuals who serve themselves and their social groups instead of serving the greatest good of the freedom to share new ideas and knowledge. A clear sign that what is identified as sin or ill-behavior is likely not is when the individuals who label it so do not speak plainly of it or have specialized terms used only by them. If they spoke plainly of what concerned them they risk their actions been seen by all and this those who seek to censure and limit do not look kindly upon. Sincerely, M. M. Musatov 14:46, 7 April 2011 (UTC)~


 * Delete - in plain words, Wikipedia is not the right place to explain or document original ideas if they have not yet been published in an academic journal or similar. Gandalf61 (talk) 14:58, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.