Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exalgina Gambôa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Being bold and closing early. Clearly passes WP:NPOL.

Thanks everyone for participating. Unhappy with this decision? If one wishes to renominate this article with another policy-based rationale, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. I will not re-review my decision. Happy holidays. Missvain (talk) 23:06, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Exalgina Gambôa

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:BIO. UPE? Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 23:06, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions.  Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 23:06, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:08, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:NPOL#1: a judge who has held national office. pburka (talk) 23:25, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Someone who "served as secretary of state for foreign affairs of Angola" seems likely to be notable. Espresso Addict (talk) 03:37, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 03:47, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 03:56, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Clearly notable, for WP:NPOL. - Naushervan (talk) 06:59, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable - passes WP:NPOL Deathlibrarian (talk) 10:36, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep I cannot tell if her position as a judge is actually on a level that would make her notable, but her position in the executive arm of government clearly was.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:06, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep: I agree with the editors above about meeting WP:NPOL. Article should be expanded not deleted. TJMSmith (talk) 22:16, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Clearly satisfies WP:POLITICIAN. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:17, 22 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.