Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Excalibur: Morgana's Revenge


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  MBisanz  talk 13:25, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Excalibur: Morgana's Revenge
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No assertion of notability (WP:N). The provided references are all self-published (WP:SPS) or otherwise unreliable (WP:Reliable sources). Also appears to have been written by someone on the development team, thus presenting WP:NPOV issues. Marasmusine (talk) 13:05, 13 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. Marasmusine (talk) 13:07, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Ah, trawling through the usual download/directory sites, I found one (1) possible source for WP:N at The Mac Observer. Personally I prefer multiple sources. If anyone else can find some significant coverage I'll gladly withdraw my nomination (in which case I'll gut the article and start it from scratch.) Marasmusine (talk) 13:17, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - notability can be established the usual way. No need to call for an exception in this case. Wily D  14:46, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - no significant coverage by reliable source to establish notability.--Boffob (talk) 16:00, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep The macobserver reference is enough for notability, especially considering the information it gives on the history of the game. They're a reliable source for this. DGG (talk) 05:33, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep InsideMacGames ("the largest and oldest Macintosh gaming publication" per WP) covered E:MR extensively.134.117.137.57 (talk) 06:39, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Have InsideMacGames published anything other than press releases / emails from Bill Catambay? Otherwise it's not particularly useful for the WP:GNG. Marasmusine (talk) 21:44, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep as above. Horselover Frost (talk) 08:35, 14 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.