Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Excel Coaches


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was Delete. Deathphoenix ʕ 17:35, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Excel Coaches
A bus company. No evidence of anything notable, fails WP:CORP by a mile. The suggestion by the person who removed a prod was possibly could be merged into List of bus routes in Kent, but I think that this information is already present, so I suggest deletion. Inner Earth 09:36, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CORP, only 628 Google results . Possibly also redirect to List of bus routes in Kent--TBC TaLk?!? 09:43, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:CORP. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 10:15, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
 *  AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Avi 17:18, 7 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Tevildo 17:23, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Computerjoe 's talk 18:42, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect as above. JYolkowski // talk 22:50, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Coach companies, even small ones, are of interest to people interested in public transportation. I believe that we would keep railroad companies of a similar size. Sjakkalle (Check!)  06:50, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Actually, as someone who writes articles on small railways (-: I agree. The significance of companies like this is because of their interaction with the general public, even if they might not meet the WP:CORP guidelines.  Changing my "vote" to keep.  JYolkowski // talk 22:47, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. As per nomination. Catherine breillat 00:00, 11 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.