Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Excellence In Broadcasting

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was redirect. This has been done. Joyous 12:09, Feb 9, 2005 (UTC)

Excellence In Broadcasting
It's simply not really notable how Rush Limbaugh calls his fictional network. Delete or redirect to Rush Limbaugh. --Conti|&#9993; 01:44, Jan 26, 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Rush Limbaugh.  -- Scott  ei&#960; + 1 = 0  02:02, Jan 26, 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect; the information's already present in Rush Limbaugh. &mdash;Korath (Talk) 02:29, Jan 26, 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect. Bart133 02:58, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect. The information is already present in Rush Limbaugh; this "network" only exists for one show; and this article would pretty much have to either be a stub or have enough detail about EiB in it to be considered fancruft anyway.  Also, the main article doesn't link to this page.  --Idont Havaname 06:26, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)  Sorry, I stand corrected -- the link is in "See also" listed as EIB.  --Idont Havaname 06:27, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect. Well known, but exclusively in the context of Limbaugh. Samaritan 07:57, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect. This is obviously an exclusive fact that should be redirected to Limbaugh.  There is no purpose in having it sit here as a stub. CryptoStorm  8:00, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect for reasons already stated. - Lucky 6.9 00:33, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect. Neutralitytalk 07:02, Jan 31, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.