Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exception (to a law)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 00:33, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Exception (to a law)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Author disputed prod on article's talk page, so nominating for AfD. Prod concern was "This is original research", would also note that the author of the article appears to also be the author of the sole reference cited. Procedural nomination, I have no opinion at this time. Seraphimblade Talk to me 22:06, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as OR andy (talk) 08:00, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, totally OR. --Lambiam 19:55, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.