Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exchange on Campus (Exonc)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 12:33, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Exchange on Campus (Exonc)
You are incorrect sir, the site is merely FOUNDED in DC, that does not mean it is limited to DC. And whoa re you to determine if it is innovative? The idea of having online classifieds is surely not. The specific way in which it is done, it is not you who should be determining its innovative nature or not.

Is there some threshold level of success Wiki requires before Exonc could be relisted. For example, say the site was really successful, would it then be banned from explaining what it is then as well because it is of "marginal" interest? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bornnomadic (talk • contribs) 23:56, April 20, 2006.

Non notable/Advert Appropriate Username 05:11, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete "While the idea was not original...". No Alexa rank; not innovative, non-notable website of partial interest only to students in Wash. D.C., as per WP:WEB.  (aeropagitica)    (talk)   06:33, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I'd take more seriously assertions that this wasn't a DC-only site if the front page didn't say "Built by GW to benefit GW," "GO COLONIALS!" and the Find Items function didn't have two options for location: George Washington University and "All DC Schools".  (It's worth a look for a laugh, because the 'Others' section has among their thirteen whopping items for listed sale a box of half-eaten matzoh, a gold chain stolen from a professor, air, bongs, and a gangsta rap coloring book.)  Delete per nom.  RGTraynor 15:40, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and RGTraynor. --Saforrest 19:28, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, Aero, and RG. Joe 19:57, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per all delete voters so far. Wikipedia is not the place for detailing recent non-notable innovations. Ans  e  ll  23:20, 20 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.