Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Excitatory gnosis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Chaos magic. (non-admin closure) &mdash; Music1201  talk  20:43, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Excitatory gnosis

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of notability. Sources are anything but reliable. Edward321 (talk) 23:50, 16 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Chaos magic, where it is discussed. I haven't found multiple independent RS for this aspect of the occult, but basic facts about it are verifiable. Best to merge back into the main article, and since I think there is little to merge, redirect. --Mark viking (talk) 01:09, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:56, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:57, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:46, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect as still questionable for a better improvable separate article. SwisterTwister   talk  07:09, 24 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.