Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exclusive competitive advantage


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:15, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Exclusive competitive advantage

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Seems to be a WP:COATRACK for promoting the company SoundHealth. DePRODed by author. TheDragonFire (talk) 14:34, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:02, 20 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - This barely even qualifies as an article. I believe it's a machine-translation of something else, particularly with gibberish sentences like "The agency uses the condition "Unfair Competitive Advantage" to accesses technological opportunities, specifically does the innovation being considered create an unfair competitive advantage for an acquirer." Exemplo347 (talk) 22:53, 20 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. The topic is a WP:FORK of Dominance (economics), and doesn't look to me in any way a likely search term. The opening paragraphs consist of generalities and platitudes. The title looks to me like a WP:NEOLOGISM dreamt up by sound-health.org, the author of the sole citation, whose home page says that they are "a technology transfer agency providing an efficient pathway to commercialization for remarkable medical innovation"; but about whom a Google search turned up nothing WP:RS at all. Narky Blert (talk) 22:00, 27 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.