Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Executive Perils, Inc.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles (talk) 01:07, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Executive Perils, Inc.

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This was originally supposed to be speedy deleted under A7, but considering the behavior of the creator I will decide to ease down to a AfD so he can have time to show his article is able to be in the main space. Rohedin TALK 19:45, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable spam. GregJackP (talk) 19:53, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete author has failed to produce any evidence of notability per policy. Leaky  Caldron  20:03, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete unless a rewrite with good sourcing turns up. At the moment this is unsourced spam. Hairhorn (talk) 20:24, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:58, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - a search doesn't find anything other than trivial coverage. Robofish (talk) 15:45, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this company. Joe Chill (talk) 01:31, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.