Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Executive response team


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 03:41, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Executive response team

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This stub has minimal value, could be incorporated into other business articles, and has no references. Andrew (talk) 23:08, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:54, 23 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Ri l ey    00:02, 29 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Unsourced, basically WP:OR. I couldn't find anything that suggests this is some kind of widespread term in any industry. It's like calling the folks that clean up spills at my office "The Accidental Liquid Dispersal Response Team". § FreeRangeFrog croak 07:20, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Unreferenced article on a non-notable topic; the bullet points expand the range vastly and amount to original research. AllyD (talk) 22:35, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete; seems to be used as a job describer occasionally, but sources describing it are far from sufficient. Definitely doesn't meet WP:V and could be construed as a WP:OR violation.   dci  &#124;  TALK   23:24, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.