Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exertional rhabdomyolysis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Mojo Hand (talk) 20:02, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Exertional rhabdomyolysis

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

concern = Detail is already covered at rhabdomyolysis. Some of the references are poor such as "sodium bicarbonate supplementation can reduce myoglobin, and prevent exertional rhabdomyolysis" based on this case study which does not support the content in question as is not about prevention. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 23:11, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:03, 27 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete as class exercise never intended to be a complete wikipedia article. Stuartyeates (talk) 02:45, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment Class states they plan to work on it more. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 03:17, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep as relevant and a distinct subtype of rhabomyolysis that has enough sources to support an individual article, but needs extensive copyediting to conform with WP:MEDMOS, sources need checking to confirm with WP:MEDRS, and some content needs triangulating with the main rhabdomyolysis article (of which I am the principal author) to avoid contradictions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jfdwolff (talk • contribs)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 13:02, 7 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep We also have an article on equine exertional rhabdomyolysis. These topics are notable and any issues just seem to be a matter of ordinary editing per our editing policy.  AFD is not cleanup. Andrew (talk) 10:28, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. PubMed lists 18 review papers that include "exertional rhabdomyolysis" in the title, such as Landau, George, Patel and O'Connor. The article should refer back to the main article ("Rhabdomyolysis") for some sections such as "Mechanism of injury", while providing only a brief summary. The article needs a LOT of clean-up. Many references are inappropriate (primary sources or not specific to exertional rhabdomyolysis). Axl  ¤  [Talk]  12:40, 11 March 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.