Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exeter International Airport Fire and Rescue Service


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mkdw talk 01:07, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Exeter International Airport Fire and Rescue Service

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:ORG. nothing in gnews nor my search of BBC. I've looked at a lot of airport articles and there is never a dedicated article for their fire service. even the category it's listed in "Airport Fire and Rescue Services in the United Kingdom", this is the only real airport fire service listed, so not sure if the category is of much value either. LibStar (talk) 00:26, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:36, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:36, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:36, 9 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete as obviously excessive for a routine department; the next step will be to delete the category.  DGG ( talk ) 03:40, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Smerge or delete. I am reluctant to delete any (verified, etc) article which has a good merge target. So, in principle, merge some of the contents (WP:SMERGE} to Exeter International Airport. However, there is maybe so little to be included it might be best written afresh. The title is not a likely search term. Thincat (talk) 07:48, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete as not really notable jsut a standard service at an airport, has no real content worthy of merging or even mentioning in airport article. We dont really need "This airport has a fire service" entry as they all have. MilborneOne (talk) 13:14, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.