Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exim Trading


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. G12 — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 21:20, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Exim Trading

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unverifiable article about a Danish publisher of child pornography. The article's only reference is a page on an activist site that does not even mention the company. When asked for sources, the author stated here that his/her information comes from The Hidden Wiki and acknowledged a lack of above ground sources. My own searches for RS coverage get some mention of the company's founder but almost nothing about Exim Trading. Fails WP:V and WP:CORP. • Gene93k (talk) 18:38, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:42, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:42, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:42, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:42, 13 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. The article appears to be a copyvio of the post by Truthseeker 34 datestamped 25-07-2013, 02:40 PM on this forum page, and uses the reference linked to there. The company existed and published the named publications according to something, somewhere in these two issues of the Victoria Government Gazette (pdfs that I cannot search). I can't find anything else, and mere existence is not enough to justify an article. Yngvadottir (talk) 19:32, 13 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete as copyvio. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 21:12, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.