Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Existence on appearance, longevity and reproductivity phenomenon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 11:30, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Existence on appearance, longevity and reproductivity phenomenon

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Undiluted original research. Pure tautology "patterns exist to an extent &hellip; proportionally to their frequency of appearance"! Author removes the prod but does not provide any references! (Mikael you have been editing Wikipedia long enough, you should know better.) -- RHaworth 16:05, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as OR. When you have a section called "Everything", you're in trouble. Clarityfiend 17:07, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as OR/nonsense. If this ever becomes a real scientific (or metascientific) subject, it is sure to get a pithier name, so an article with this name is never going to be needed. It's a pity, in a way, because I was looking forward to reading about Astrosociobiology. Sheffield Steel talkstalk 18:50, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep It could and sounds like nonsense, but I think we should give the author a chance to improve it. scope_creep 18:52, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete No, sorry, delete as OR or nonsense. Wikipedia is not the place to work out his theories. Shawn in Montreal 23:53, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Clarity says it best. If you can't find a single source to cite to, you're writing about your own original ideas.  Mandsford 01:41, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, OR. Doctorfluffy 07:38, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and I think the original author now agrees (see talk page) LeContexte 08:24, 2 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.