Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exit (economics)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Barriers to exit. (non-admin closure) — Yashtalk stalk 18:55, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Exit (economics)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not an economic term (see Glossary of economics). Reference provided is an abstract which uses "exit" in quotes. Creator is blocked sockpuppet and major contributor was indef'ed for disruptive editing. – S. Rich (talk) 19:11, 1 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment – perhaps a WP:BLAR to Exit strategy would work as an alternative to showing this article the door. – S. Rich (talk) 19:14, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:01, 3 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Redirect or delete. Exit is a fine economic term, for instance one of the theoretical conditions for a competitive market is cost-less exit and entry, so if there is a redirect, I'd recommend Barriers to exit. The age of the article makes me want to suggest redirect for history preservation, but the lack of interesting information in the history and the unlikeliness of this as a search term make me want to suggest delete. Smmurphy(Talk) 18:27, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect as suggested by to Barriers to exit and WP:CHEAP. Bearian (talk) 20:02, 6 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.