Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exit Clōv


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  Daniel →♦  10:19, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Exit Clōv

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

No assertions of notability whatsoever. Unverifiable - only links are to their webpage, their myspace page, and AMG. Also, the article is spammy. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 18:54, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete: On the one hand, they're an indie self-produced with only 51 Google hits and a stupid name. On the other, they have a work for sale off of the Virgin Digital site.  What I wonder is how difficult is that to arrange, and how discriminatory is Virgin Digital?    RGTraynor  21:09, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Apparently Virgin isn't discriminatory at all. Not notable. Realkyhick 22:04, 4 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.