Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exotica (book)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  01:32, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Exotica (book)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable book; fails WP:NBOOKS. Mikeblas (talk) 13:35, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 13:46, 8 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - The subject fails all five criteria of WP:BKCRIT due to lack of available sources.- MrX 14:41, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:08, 8 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. I did a bit of searching and found several reviews. I also see where the book is extensively used as a source and quoted in some academic/scholarly work and is a recommended read for at least one college course. It's light, but it's enough to help show notability. I have a very, very strong suspicion that there is more out there, just that it'll take a while to find since the book was published before the Internet was really a thing. Tokyogirl79  (｡◕‿◕｡)   06:10, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 03:09, 16 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. It is notable enough with all of the reviews to be kept. Frmorrison (talk) 03:49, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.