Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Expatriate Archive Centre


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:12, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Expatriate Archive Centre

 * – ( View AfD View log )

With just over 19.000 internet hits, 2 Google Scholar, 0 (zero) on Google news and 7 on Google Groups, there are not so many really independent and reliable sources. A lot of hits are local websites, blogs or the own website. I regard this organization as not notable. Night of the Big Wind talk  11:57, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Unsourced, and no sign that I can see of notability. Elton Bunny (talk) 12:42, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:20, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:20, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:20, 3 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, → Σ  τ  c . 00:19, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - TP 01:59, 11 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per nominator. Activities don't seem notable, and lack of coverage indicates it fails WP:NGO/WP:ORG. JFHJr (㊟) 05:11, 11 November 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.