Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Expectro-Realism

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 09:26, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Expectro-Realism
This page is original research (even by its own admission). According to Google, the term doesn't appear anywhere but Wikipedia (on the dead-end page) and on an apparent link farm (that appears to be mining Wikipedia). The subject matter of the article is highly dubious, dare I say patent nonsense. This should be deleted. -- Cleduc 03:38, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Delete. Original research. Even trying for different spellings, no connects on Google. HowardB 05:49, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete "new topic under research" clearly makes it original research. --Deathphoenix 06:34, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Trilobite (Talk) 10:45, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Original research.   &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 00:45, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Original research.  Jayjg (talk)  05:24, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * No evidence of being factual. Unless verified, delete as patent nonsense. - Mike Rosoft 13:49, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)