Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Experimental finance


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. Consensus is to keep - if the spammy link at the bottom bothers you, remove it. Wily D 15:06, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Experimental finance
Propose delete of this original research promoting software vendor. --Gavin Collins 07:53, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - Although it was written by the publisher of software used for the analysis of Experimental Finance, it still looks like it is a valid finance principle and should stay. Perhaps you should look at the JessX software page and see if that is spam.  User: (talk • contribs • count ) 12:33, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge. This is outside my realm of expertise so I cannot speak definitively but a search on this term seems to pull up at least a few good academic resources on the topic.  Many seem to be intrinsically linked to behavioral finance and so I wonder if it might not be best to merge it there until someone with better knowledge on the subject can improve and expand on it.  Ark yan  &#149; (talk) 16:03, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete the attempt to use an article about a possible general concept to promote an individual computer program--unsourced except for the link to that program. Whether it is a valid concept would depend on other uses and sources; if an article could be written, this wouldnt be of much help. . DGG 21:23, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment apparently written to provide much-needed support for the very spammy article about the software in the see-also. DGG 01:05, 3 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep per above. --Djsasso 22:34, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per Plm209. It's a start.  JessX otoh is very spamy. John Vandenberg 22:12, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.