Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Experteer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Per WP:NPASR. (non-admin closure) — UY Scuti Talk  18:46, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Experteer

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The references are mere notices, or promotional,  inclusion in a list of other such firms or applications. . The firm is not notable  DGG ( talk ) 08:01, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  08:18, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  08:18, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  08:18, 21 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as my searches appeared to find several links at Books, News and Highbeam but nothing convincingly better. Notifying tagger and AfC accepter .  SwisterTwister   talk  08:19, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Commment The references are essentially press releases and notices. Not notable.  DGG ( talk ) 08:01, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Ahem DGG I would normally remove and fix your mistakes but....were you aware you're the nominator here?  SwisterTwister   talk  08:10, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Ooops. Thanks,, there are just so many of them .... — Preceding unsigned comment added by DGG (talk • contribs) 08:17, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 15:01, 28 November 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  19:39, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
 * At best if there's no better consensus before December 12 (Saturday), it may have to be relisted. Notifying and  who have asked me to notify them of low traffic AfDs.  SwisterTwister   talk  05:39, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the notification here and at Articles for deletion/Dilly Hussain. Cunard (talk) 06:52, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Keep per the significant coverage in reliable sources.  Chapter 3 of the book beginning page 221 is titled: "Case Study: Experteer GmbH, München". That a book published by the reliable publisher Springer Science+Business Media has covered the company in substantial detail in a case study is enough to establish notability.  The book provides several paragraphs of coverage about Experteer.  The article notes: "Mit Hilfe der Android-App „ Jobs finden, Karriere machen “ lässt sich gezielt nach Jobs jenseits der 60.000-Euro-Gehaltsgrenze suchen. Unter dem Namen „Experteer“ findet sich die Android-App „Jobs finden, Karriere machen“ nach der Installation auf dem Android-Gerät wieder. Experteer versteht sich als Karriereplattform für „Deutschlands beste Köpfe“ und listet nur Jobs, die mit mindestens 60.000 Euro dotiert sind. Die App bietet einen einfachen Zugang zu dieser Plattform, sofern der Nutzer bereit ist, sich zu registrieren. Allerdings sind viele der Jobangebote nur für Premium-Nutzer zugänglich. Die zahlen für ihre Mitgliedschaft je nach Vertragsdauer zwischen 9,90 und 29,90 Euro im Monat. Nützliche Vor-Filterung Anders als die üblichen Jobbörsen lässt sich die Experteer-Plattform vorwiegend über Filtereinstellungen durchsuchen, die der Nutzer über die Schaltflächen „Branche“, „Funktionsbereich“, „Karrierelevel“ und „Ort“ definiert. Außerdem kann er auf einer Von-Bis-Skala seine Gehaltsvorstellung vorgeben. Ein Filter-Set lässt sich als „Suchagent“ speichern, die Jobsuche kann dann jederzeit wiederholt werden. Wer aktiv für sich werben möchte, kann über die App zusätzlich ein Profil anlegen, in dem er Angaben zu seiner Berufserfahrung und seinen Kenntnissen macht. Nach Experteer-Angaben greifen rund 10.000 Headhunter auf diese Profile zu. Das Design ist ansprechend und funktionell, die Handhabung intuitiv." The Google Translate of the article: "Using the Android app 'find jobs, make a career' can search specifically for jobs beyond the 60,000-euro-content limit. Under the name of 'Experteer' there is the Android app 'find jobs, make a career' after installing on the Android device again. Experteer sees itself as a career platform for 'Germany's best minds' and lists only jobs that are doped with at least 60,000 euros. The app provides an easy access to this platform, provided that the user is ready to register. However, many of the jobs are only available to premium users. The pay for their membership depending on contract term 9.90 to 29.90 euros a month. Useful pre-filtering Unlike the usual job boards, the Experteer platform can be searched mainly on filter settings that the user defines via the 'industry', 'functional area', 'career level' and 'place'. He can pretend to a from-to scale his salary. A filter set can be saved as 'search agent', the job search process can then be repeated anytime. Those who want to actively promote themselves, can also create a profile, in which he gives details about his professional experience and his knowledge of the app. After Experteer information access about 10,000 headhunters to these profiles. The design is appealing and functional, intuitive handling."</li> </ol>There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Experteer to pass Notability, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Cunard (talk) 06:52, 9 December 2015 (UTC)</li></ul>
 * Keep per Cunard. This is to be here due to the language, however, Cunard did the heavy work for me. Kudos! --<i style="color:#B00000; font-family:Casual;">MurderByDeletionism</i><sup style="color:black;">"bang!" 03:50, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:51, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak Keep – Per the sources listed above by Cunard. The last two sources above provide coverage beyond mentions, but are rather short. North America1000 06:49, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment - I would sincerely appreciate it if this was relisted a third time for better comments. SwisterTwister   talk  06:52, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Onel 5969  <i style="color:blue">TT me</i> 13:14, 12 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.