Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Explosive Pro Wrestling (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:28, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Explosive Pro Wrestling
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Doesn't meet WP:CORP. Nikki ♥  311   00:21, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions.  — Nikki  ♥  311   00:22, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  — Nikki  ♥  311   00:23, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  — Nikki  ♥  311   00:23, 17 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Then I have to ask why is Israeli Pro Wrestling Association still around here on wiki? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Notaussie (talk • contribs)
 * See WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS. Nikki  ♥  311   14:46, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  — The-Pope (talk) 12:10, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:58, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I agree with the above comment. If the person talking about the other association does not think that should have an article either the answer is to AFD that one as well not to keep this one.--76.66.185.169 (talk) 21:44, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - TP 02:46, 31 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Doesn't pass WP:CORP and doesn't have significant coverage in independent reliable sources, so doesn't pass WP:GNG. Jenks24 (talk) 13:47, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete lacks third party sources. Fails WP:GNG LibStar (talk) 12:32, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.