Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Explosive mine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) st170e talk 15:29, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Explosive mine

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Implausible search term, especially since the lede says "A mine is...". I'm not sure what this started out as, but it is now a page that lists "related items." It is a duplicate of the "Military" heading on the Mine dab, except for two entries (which have been added to that page, even though they're sort of tangential). This page was also linked to the dab (and vice-versa), so all it really does is add an unnecessary layer of complexity to the search. MSJapan (talk) 00:34, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Eminently valid set index and labelled as one. Andy Dingley (talk) 00:38, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:07, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:07, 16 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep - I agree with Andy that it appears to be a valid Set Index article. DeVerm (talk) 21:39, 16 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.