Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exponentialism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Babajobu 04:10, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Exponentialism
This afd nomination was incomplete. The nominator's reasoning was [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Exponentialism&diff=prev&oldid=36887122 A quick search on Google shows what a lame stub this is. This Wiki article is, I think, the only link for this neologism.]. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 15:23, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to technological singularity. Ruby 16:03, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as neologism per nom. Google Scholar tells me that there is an older alternative usage in library science that gets used from time to time, which argues against a redirect. --- Charles Stewart(talk) 16:12, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

'This AfD is being relisted to generate a clearer consensus. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks! Deathphoenix' 01:12, 3 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete nn, about 50 unique google hits -- Astrokey44 |talk 05:49, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Charles Stewart. Kusma (討論) 16:13, 3 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.