Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Export and Industry Bank


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:04, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Export and Industry Bank

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable as per WP:COMPANY. Its only references are "trivial or incidental coverage." Raykyogrou0 ( Talk ) 05:12, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Easy Keep - as with other 20 plus Philippines banks, sorry but nominator does not know how to search in Google Books.
 * Trade Policy Review: The Philippines 1999 - Volume 67 - Page 55 "The private sector in the meantime set up the Export and Industry Bank in 1997 to service the financing needs of exporters. "
 * Country Finance: Philippines 2003 -- Page 94 "The Export Development Act also created the Export and Industry Bank of the Philippines (ExportBank), which offers trade-financing services-including letters of credit, collection of bills, issuance of bonds and guarantees, import advances ..."
 * Raykyogrou0, please add these sources to the article. In ictu oculi (talk) 01:07, 14 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Feel free to add them yourself. But how deep is the subject of the article covered in these sources?  Or are they simply mentioned a few times? (I wouldn't know, since you didn't show me any links)  Raykyogrou0  ( Talk ) 10:15, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy close. WP:COMPANY states that "Editors coming across an article on such a company without such references are encouraged to search (or request that others search) prior to nominating for deletion, given the very high likelihood that a publicly traded company is actually notable according to the primary criterion." It appears this was not met, if that has been done, they a 2nd nomination may be pursued. – H T  D  12:07, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Seriously, what makes you think I didn't? Raykyogrou0  ( Talk ) 13:14, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:55, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:55, 14 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Close/Keep AFD isn't used as a clean up, Also per HTD. - →Davey 2010→ →Talk to me!→  04:47, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Sigh. This isn't about cleanup. Raykyogrou0  ( Talk ) 13:14, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. Try again, .  Seriously, you're not even trying. --Sky Harbor (talk) 08:31, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Exactly which of these "sources" have in-depth coverage about the subject? The first link is a hiring ad. The second is a public memo. Three links talk about annual stockholder meetings. Raykyogrou0  ( Talk ) 09:23, 16 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment. The comments saying "Speedy Keep" or "Close" are not actual speedy keep criterion.  Raykyogrou0  ( Talk ) 09:23, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.