Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Export strategy (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Export. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 22:35, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Export strategy
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Duplicates Export, the list of advantages/disadvantages could be easily added to Export and there is nothing in the lead to establish any added value in the Export strategy topic not covered by Export. Previous AFD resulted in "Userfy" for similar reasons. Ash (talk) 13:32, 7 September 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:17, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge relevant material to Export. As a bonus, that might take care of the worldwide tag in the latter article. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 14:35, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 22:56, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Comment: this article was copy-edited somewhat and nominated for rescue. --Mokhov (talk) 02:56, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge on a common-sensical basis. The subject matter is wholly subsumed by Export, which is not so long as to require a more specific content-fork. Ray  Talk 11:56, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge. Same topic. —Lowellian (reply) 06:42, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.