Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Express Raja


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Drmies (talk) 03:40, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Express Raja

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of significance. Olowe2011 Talk 20:47, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  21:37, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  21:37, 28 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete for now as this exists per Need and browser links but the most recent coverage is May and would likely be best restarted when better. SwisterTwister   talk  21:38, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Actually there is  far more recent news for those who look (hint: best to use WP:INDAFD for Indian films). For instance, Daily News & Analysis September 14, 2015 tells us " scenes with the lead cast are being shot in the areas of Nizampet, Hyderabad"... and indicator that we might look to WP:NFF (paragraph 3).  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 20:36, 29 September 2015 (UTC)


 * director:
 * lead:
 * lead:
 * studio:
 * WP:INDAFD: "Express Raja" Sharwanand "Merlapaka Gandhi" Surabi "UV Creations"

*Delete temporarily. Just a touch TOO SOON. While filming has begun it is still a bit short of meeting WP:NFF (paragraph 3). No great loss to lose the very short stub and a far better and more comprehensive article can be allowed to be recreated in a just a few weeks.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 20:36, 29 September 2015 (UTC) struck per my argument below.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 06:41, 30 September 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Neutral > Weak Keep. There were enough available sources speaking toward the film's production that I decided to re-visit the one-line stub which  was nominated to make some sourced improvements to bring it to short start class. More can be done, certainly... and I think in a week or two it meeting WP:NFF (paragraph 3) will be far more obvious. Thanks.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 06:41, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor Talk! 16:08, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Too soon to tell. The director does not have an article--the link goes merely to one of his films. Entering prinicpal photography should only justify a new movie when there is some real possibility that it will be notable once released.  DGG ( talk ) 11:55, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Well, that a director does not have an article (and this fellow really should and will as my next project) simply means we do not have a place to which to redirect or merge. And a user's prediction of possible failure is as crystal as a user's prediction of possible success. What is clarified for editors in WP:NFF is an acknowledgement of topic notability determinable through findable coverage, used or not... and that in either failure OR success, a film topic's notability is dependent on media coverage of the film's overall production. Just sayin'.   Schmidt,  Michael Q. 14:26, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
 * aas always, I defer to your expertise in this areas--I was judging as best i could from the material as it  was presented DGG ( talk ) 13:24, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:28, 10 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.