Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Expressions with piss


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. BJ Talk 00:29, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Expressions with piss

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This article is original research, and reads a bit like a personal opinion essay. None of the sources address the concept of "Expressions with piss." Instead, they are examples of it in history that the article author decided himself represent a phenomenon worthy of an article, i.e., original synthesis of published material. I don't see this concept as being a fruitful subject for an encyclopedia article, in any case (the list of expressions and their definitions would be treated by Wiktionary). Dominic·t 20:43, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is an essay comparing the use of the word "piss" in two specific literary works, not an article on the word in general. Zetawoof(&zeta;) 22:02, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete- Personal essay. Wikipedia is not the place for original works. Reyk  YO!  22:34, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete – an essay chock-full of synthesis. MuZemike 23:34, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Hang on a sec (comment) - I do see something potentially worthwhile about an article on the cultural significance of urine. Maybe the article needs to be revised and re-titled, but I wouldn't want to throw out the baby with the, er, pisswater. J L G 4 1 0 4  00:42, 21 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.