Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Extè


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. This has been going for a month and a half, which really shouldn't have happened. No consensus is by definition the result. Stifle (talk) 16:48, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Extè

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable fashion company. The first result for "extè" on Google is their website which is down, the second is the article page on Wikipedia. Jean (t&middot;c) 23:48, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment It's certainly not an open and shut delete. What the first or second Google search is is irrelevant to WP:ORG, the applicable notability standard. Does it have significant coverage in multiple reliable and independent sources, with some regional/national/international coverage? See [Google news archive], especially if you can read Italian, which I can only Google translate into semi Gibberish. There are false hits since it is also part of "exte-nsion" or "exte-rior" in hyphenated text. What do the followinge say?, , , ,, . In English, at Google Books I find  (not sure if this is an article or an advert). "Flash Art" had what appears from the snippet to be substantial coverage in 1997: . "Travel & leisure: Volume 31" had some coverage of unknown extent as shown by the search page snippet "Among the hot names in the downstairs section, leased to fashion- forward clothing retailer Don Gil, are labels such as Hugo (by German designer Hugo Boss), O&G leans, Exte, and— of course— Helmut Lang. "  Edison (talk) 00:23, 17 December 2011 (UTC).


 * looks like the only article from a proper newspaper, but it would appear to be more about the new CEO of the company and how she plans to "re-launch" Extè. I can't say with certainty because access to the article is limited. is a local newspaper article with little coverage; it's about how the group that owned Exté was in financial trouble, and the article talks about how they were planning to recover. But if you go on their website there's no mention of Exté, and the Exté website is empty and still says "copyright 2010"., , and  all look like small fashion blogs, some read like adverts. One blog is even called Pubblicità Italia which literally means advertisement Italy. About the results you found in Google Books:  would appear to be an advertisement. Perhaps a fashion expert could comment on the notability of the other publications. Jean (t&middot;c) 09:49, 17 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:45, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:45, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 17 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Alpha_Quadrant    (talk)  17:49, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Keep - 81 News Hits in La Repubblica news archive are definitely enough to support a claim of notability.--Cavarrone (talk) 05:11, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bryce  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 15:23, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Alpha_Quadrant    (talk)  06:28, 12 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment: There are over 200 GNews about the subject... - Cavarrone (talk) 07:04, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: Not properly transcluded. Fixed. &mdash; Train2104 (talk • contribs) 20:17, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.