Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ext3grep


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Ext3. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:15, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Ext3grep

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

All that I can find is trivial mentions. Fails WP:N. Joe Chill (talk) 23:48, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  00:17, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 01:51, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it does fail WP:N, so it shouldn't have its own article. But it's verifiable, so some mention should be kept per WP:PRESERVE. Therefore, merge to Ext3 is the outcome consistent with policy and guidelines.— S Marshall   Talk / Cont  00:34, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Do not merge only mention, since it's not part of ext3fs, but a utility for it. 76.66.192.144 (talk) 05:09, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Redirect to Ext3 with a brief mention; I can't see much chance of this article being expanded beyond its current sub-stub status. Best mentioned in the context of the file system. ~ mazca  talk 12:17, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect per Mazca. Rafablu88  18:43, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.