Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Extate


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete.  (aeropagitica)   (talk)   08:13, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

Extate
Freshly founded company, non-notable. Wikipedia is not the yellow pages. Haakon 18:31, 12 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete Non-notable. Pretty average looking business. BlueValour 18:50, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:CORP. Kimchi.sg 19:57, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. DarthVad e r 23:26, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. &mdash; Khoikhoi 03:39, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - it is an advertisment and not encyclopedic. Ali0th 07:29, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Don't Delete - Deemed notable by Real Estate Enthusiast, Point2 Agent, Rainy City Guide, NuBricks 11:20, 13 June 2006 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.169.51.179 (talk • contribs)
 * Note: User's first edit. Haakon 10:20, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Don't Delete - An article on a similar company exists - 'RightMove' without issues. Don't discriminate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.144.177.184 (talk • contribs)
 * User's only edits are to this AfD or the article. He has repeatedly tried to blank this AfD and remove the AfD tag from the article. Kimchi.sg 09:51, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. Nice try 86.144.177.184 but no candy. RightMove is listed on the LSE and therefore passes WP notability. Your company is not and therefore does not. --BlueValour 17:27, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. So much for encouraging startups! The fact is that RightMove is a regular portal and Extate has real unique search engine technology. Who is to judge that users will value a company more because its listed on a stock exchange?  They couldn't care less. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.144.89.192 (talk • contribs)
 * Comment. This is an encyclopaedia not an aid to startups. Please read WP:CORP. BlueValour 19:54, 14 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment. So how come software like [PmWiki] deserves an article then? And all the other software out there? Cause its wiki? Or cause its open source? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.144.89.192 (talk • contribs)
 * DELETE Antmoney85 17:54, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - --Nobunaga24 00:44, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nomination and force author to read WP:NOT a thousand times. Equendil Talk 01:07, 15 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.