Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Extended Capability RFID


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- DQ  (t)   (e)  22:07, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Extended Capability RFID

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not a recognized or commonly-used term; references indicate it is a marketing term used by a single non-notable company (Intelliflex, which has an article created by the same person who created this). &mdash; Chowbok  ☠  18:21, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 12:51, 15 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:45, 21 June 2011 (UTC)




 * Merge Could be placed under the article for RFID for now. Rxlxm (talk) 02:58, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

While the term "Extended Capability RFID" is one that Intelleflex uses to market its products, it is also relevant to broadening the discussion of new categories of RFID that are based on industry standards published by ISO and EPC. It could be merged into the broader RFID category but this may stifle discussion on the value and applicability of these new standards. Kevin Payne, Intelleflex. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KpayneIntelleflex (talk • contribs) 15:09, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
 * delete Spam Spartaz Humbug! 20:06, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.