Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Extended Shelf Life (ESL)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jayjg (talk) 02:39, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Extended Shelf Life (ESL)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Contested PROD. Smappy (talk) 10:12, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nonstandard name (should be "Extended Shelf Life" or "Extended shelf life") and there is no content...well really at all. No prejudice against writing an actual stub or better article at an appropriate title, but this ain't it. It doesn't even define the term (less than a dictdef) enough say/describe what it actually is, just declares its genre, and it doesn't assert notability or distinction/specificity in its genre enough to be able to determine that. I'd say merge/redirect to pasteurization, since that's the topic, but the redirect would be WP:CSD due to naming problem. Best to scrap and restart when someone feels like actually writing some content. The topic is mentioned in pasteurization, but there's not enough content to warrant a separate page right now "just for the sake of having a page about it in case someone wants to write something" as I understand the creator's stated concern. DMacks (talk) 10:35, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: failed to describe what ESL is, besides being a pasteurization process. Alexius08 (talk) 14:43, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. No real context to describe what the process really is, why it's notable, what person's/companies may use this process... A lot of content could be here, but nothing that isn't mentioned elsewhere. In addition to the Pasteurization article, (mentioned above) content can be found under High pressure food preservation and Microfiltration. -Avic enna sis @ 07:02, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - a complete lack of any useful content -- Whpq (talk) 21:43, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.