Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Extraprotential


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:34, 6 November 2005 (UTC)

Extraprotential
If this were a real word, it should go to wiktionary, but there are no google results, and it's not in the dictionary. — MC MasterChef  ::  Leave a tip — 12:48, 1 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete per nomination. --mdd4696 13:33, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
 * delete nonsense jnothman talk 14:07, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per G1 patent nonsense. "Content that, while apparently meaningful after a fashion, is so completely and irredeemably confused that no intelligent person can be expected to make sense of it" fits the bill here. If not, then delete as just plain nonsense. - Sensor 00:23, 2 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.